There are a two divisions in food which can be classified as vegetarian and non vegetarian. As we all know the difference between vegetarian and non vegetarian, i am not going to discuss about it. But, the major confusion comes in the food called egg. There are certain group which are calling the egg as vegetarian and certain other groups calling them as non-vegetarian. So, finally they both compromised as started to call them as neither veg nor non-veg and coined the term called eggitarian. There was a greater confusion whether the egg came from hen or hen came from egg, which was the first? and after a lot of research, it was found out that, only chick came from egg and conclusion was made that only egg came from hen first.
The taste of non-veg is such that, once we started to eat them, it would be very much difficult to stop eating them. Many of my friends have told me this statement. There are a lot of vegetarian friends I have, who have admitted this statement. But, I am having another curious friend, who was once upon a time non-veg and got converted into a pure veg. I am still not getting how that transformation was possible. I am still wondering about that. There are a lot of variety of non-veg, chicken is the universal and readily available everywhere. The fishes are those which are mostly available only on the coastal areas or the regions that are covered by the water bodies. The goat or mutton is the another commonly eaten non-veg, which are also not available in major parts of country.
Then there can be many other non-veg like pork or beef which are not considered in this post as I am not well aware of them and not-interested in knowing about them. As far as me, the chicken, mutton and fishes are the non-veg that might be enough for the lifetime. So, there is a statement by some of the vegetarians, that killing lives are sin. I agree with that, but the plants and other vegetarian items are mostly eaten by these living beings, is that right enough to consume the food of them. If we not kill them and eat, there will be a shortage of food for them and anyhow they are going to die. To maintain a balance in the environment, there is a need that arises for the consumption of these foods. There are a lot of vegetarians who kill these foods for leather and business, if that is not wrong, then killing them for food is also not wrong.
The taste of non-veg is such that, once we started to eat them, it would be very much difficult to stop eating them. Many of my friends have told me this statement. There are a lot of vegetarian friends I have, who have admitted this statement. But, I am having another curious friend, who was once upon a time non-veg and got converted into a pure veg. I am still not getting how that transformation was possible. I am still wondering about that. There are a lot of variety of non-veg, chicken is the universal and readily available everywhere. The fishes are those which are mostly available only on the coastal areas or the regions that are covered by the water bodies. The goat or mutton is the another commonly eaten non-veg, which are also not available in major parts of country.
Then there can be many other non-veg like pork or beef which are not considered in this post as I am not well aware of them and not-interested in knowing about them. As far as me, the chicken, mutton and fishes are the non-veg that might be enough for the lifetime. So, there is a statement by some of the vegetarians, that killing lives are sin. I agree with that, but the plants and other vegetarian items are mostly eaten by these living beings, is that right enough to consume the food of them. If we not kill them and eat, there will be a shortage of food for them and anyhow they are going to die. To maintain a balance in the environment, there is a need that arises for the consumption of these foods. There are a lot of vegetarians who kill these foods for leather and business, if that is not wrong, then killing them for food is also not wrong.
Comments
Post a Comment