There are certain questions that demand a proper answer but the reply given to them, need not be accurate enough to the situation. Those times the answers received might be unwanted and may not be correct. These are considered as unwanted answers. They were just trying to cope up with some cooked up stories and trying to make the question as zero. This scenario can be considered as unwanted answers. This comes with mainly with political situations and majorly takes part in Talk shows present in news channels. They just want to hype something and end up in managing the current scenario.
Most of the questions asked won't be productive at all, they either wanted to increase the TRP by asking unwanted questions and expecting unwanted answers and most of the questions would be prepared and sent to the interviewee, so that they can come up with answer in order that they can cope up with something and manage the situation. The channel demands TRP and commercial returns while the who is being interviewed is just gaining publicity, the important events of livelihood are not covered but the election of a actors association is given higher priority and importance.
Can anyone come up with the statement of answering frankly and accept their mistakes, they can never do that, because they does not lose their vote banks. Similarly, the businessman who have evaded taxes or loans are being escaped from law, but those people who are getting loans in thousands are screwed severely, can anyone come up with answers for these, no our livelihood is like, we are surviving, why to bother about others. It has just become survival of the fittest, till a fight comes for food, this situation would never change, only thing that can be done is save our time and do something useful rather than wasting time of watching those shows which are providing us with unwanted answers.
Most of the questions asked won't be productive at all, they either wanted to increase the TRP by asking unwanted questions and expecting unwanted answers and most of the questions would be prepared and sent to the interviewee, so that they can come up with answer in order that they can cope up with something and manage the situation. The channel demands TRP and commercial returns while the who is being interviewed is just gaining publicity, the important events of livelihood are not covered but the election of a actors association is given higher priority and importance.
Can anyone come up with the statement of answering frankly and accept their mistakes, they can never do that, because they does not lose their vote banks. Similarly, the businessman who have evaded taxes or loans are being escaped from law, but those people who are getting loans in thousands are screwed severely, can anyone come up with answers for these, no our livelihood is like, we are surviving, why to bother about others. It has just become survival of the fittest, till a fight comes for food, this situation would never change, only thing that can be done is save our time and do something useful rather than wasting time of watching those shows which are providing us with unwanted answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment